If someone drives into the back of your car while you are
stationary, you wouldn't expect to be penalized by your insurer would you? At
least, I didn't – but that's exactly what happened to me.
The incident happened last summer when a van driver turned into
the entrance to the car park I was parked just outside of (in a marked bay),
damaging the rear bumper and paintwork of my VW Golf. The van driver admitted
fault and we swapped insurance details.
I contacted my insurer, which is part of the
Admiral group, and it swiftly sorted out repairs to my car and, sometime later,
claimed successfully from the van driver's insurer. I asked before I made the
claim whether it would affect my premium – although I assumed it wouldn't as I
wasn't at fault – and was assured it wouldn't.
Yesterday I was given a renewal quote and it has risen from
approximately Car
insurance renewal has been rising steadily, but I hadn't expected an
increase of quite that much. In fact, I had assumed that my six years no-claims
bonus would ensure I was paying roughly the same, which had been the case for
the past five years.
So I asked Elephant: why the hefty rise? The lady I spoke to in
the renewals department told me it was because of the incident last summer.
Although it had been resolved and registered as a no-fault claim, the Admiral group
charges higher premiums whether drivers are at fault or not. Apparently, now I
have made a claim Admiral considers that statistically I am more likely to make
another claim in the future.
And the increased insurance premium is not confined to the
damaged vehicle: one of my colleagues, whose car was damaged by vandals last
autumn while parked in London (the wing mirror on the pavement side was smashed
off), found that although her car insurance premium was unaffected, when she
came to insure a horsebox that will never be parked in London the insurer
insisted on taking this previous – and in 30 years of driving, only – claim
into account.
I suggested to Admiral that maybe I shouldn't have claimed at
all and paid for the damage myself, but was I informed that I am legally
obliged to report any incident to my insurer, whether I pursue the claim or
not. So damned if I do or damned if I don't.
Apparently, the member of staff in the insurance claims
department who told me my premium would be unaffected must have meant my
existing premium, not my renewal premium.
[Source: https://www.theguardian.com/money/blog/2012/feb/15/car-insurance-no-fault-claims-elephant]
No comments:
Post a Comment